Democracy Now reports [h/t Glinda]
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has announced the last of the more than 30,000 troops that entered Afghanistan following President Obama’s orders for a surge in 2009 have now left the country. Panetta claimed the surge had accomplished its mission of curbing the Taliban’s momentum and bolstering Afghan security forces. Nearly 70,000 U.S. troops remain in Afghanistan amidst ongoing violence there, including an uptick in so-called green-on-blue attacks by Afghan forces against foreign troops.
So, the number of troops officially left in Afghanistan pretty much matches the number of special ops forces, 66,000, who could be anywhere in the world. But who's counting? Certainly not the American people, who by definition are left in the dark--most Americans think of the Green Berets, Navy Seals, Army Rangers et al as superheroes deserving the same respect for privacy as Clark Kent. USSOCOM may as well be the president's private army, because secrecy keeps them completely shielded from democratic control, or in the words of Andrew Bacevich
Employing USSOCOM as your own private military means never having to say you're sorry.
If all of them are in Afghanistan, then there are actually twice as many troops there as reported, but most likely some are in Pakistan, some in Syria, Libya, various other African and Asian countries, including a recent foray into North Korea. Even Mexico has been visited secretly. No one--ally, enemy, or neutral--is exempt from them. Some estimates have U.S. special ops forces in 120 counties. We really don't know. Meet the new U.S. Army, in which we the people don't need to know a damn thing about what they're doing. It makes the old-fashioned congressional declarations of war more quaint than ever.
Andrew Bacevich writing for Mother Jones
Yet when it comes to military policy, the Obama administration's success in shutting down wars conducted in plain sight tells only half the story, and the lesser half at that. More significant has been this president's enthusiasm for instigating or expanding secret wars, those conducted out of sight and by commandos.
snipJohn F. Kennedy famously gave the Green Berets their distinctive headgear. Obama has endowed the whole special operations "community" with something less decorative but far more important: privileged status that provides special operators with maximum autonomy while insulating them from the vagaries of politics, budgetary or otherwise. Congress may yet require the Pentagon to undertake some (very modest) belt-tightening, but one thing's for sure: No one is going to tell USSOCOM to go on a diet. What the special ops types want, they will get, with few questions asked—and virtually none of those few posed in public.
snipThis cultural transformation has important political implications. It represents the ultimate manifestation of the abyss now separating the military and society. . . . As one consequence, the American people have forfeited owner's rights over their army, having less control over the employment of US forces than New Yorkers have over the management of the Knicks or Yankees.
snipIn short, handing war to the special operators severs an already too tenuous link between war and politics; it becomes war for its own sake. Remember George W. Bush's "Global War on Terror"? Actually, his war was never truly global. War waged in a special-operations-first world just might become truly global—and never-ending....
Also missing from the official 70,000 count are private contractors and mercenaries, yet another method through which the public debate necessary for functioning democracy is subverted:
More civilian contractors working for American companies than American soldiers died in Afghanistan last year for the first time during the war.
snipAmerican employers here are under no obligation to publicly report the deaths of their employees and frequently do not. While the military announces the names of all its war dead, private companies routinely notify only family members. Most of the contractors die unheralded and uncounted — and in some cases, leave their survivors uncompensated.
snip... There were 113,491 employees of defense contractors in Afghanistan as of January 2012, compared with about 90,000 American soldiers, according to Defense Department statistics. Of those, 25,287, or about 22 percent of the employees, were American citizens, with 47 percent Afghans and 31 percent from other countries.
Yet another example of an official pronouncement of the USG describing a fairy tale reality intended to sooth the American public while covering over the much more complex, insidious reality.
Comments
The Emperor's Praetorian Guard
Thank you for this timely post, Geomoo. The public is ready for serious cuts in our military budget. It's not the public that's afraid of the Pentagon, it's the politicians. No one wants to be labeled a dove, so they all run around seeing who can be the biggest chickenhawk. These men and women who would never have considered actually wearing the uniform disgust me in the servile bootlicking manner in which they treat the Pentagon.
You are welcome
And you do not exaggerate. Daniel Ellsburg and Wesley Clark have gone so far as to say an internal coup occurred during George W.'s first term. Who can say? In any case, it is a matter of degree.
Related to the "policy coup"
This interview (see video below) from The Real News exposes the fact that the neocons persuaded G W Bush to ignore warnings of an impending terrorist attack and concentrate on regime change in Iraq as per the neocon policy paper Securing the Realm which called for regime change in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Iran which were seen as possible future threats to Israel.
By 1 January 2001 they had drafted "war plans designed around a joint military offensive by the US and Israel". The offensive would, “fatally strike the centers of radicalism in the Middle East.”
As per neocons Wurmser and Feith
Warnings were ignored and our "New Pearl Harbor" arrived.
The timing was perfect. The event would serve as the justification to proceed with earlier developed neocon plans to secure the realm and embark on a war on terror with the neocons now leading from behind (the policy coup).
With The Grand Chessboard (please scroll down to see customer reviews) serving as a strategic blueprint it is apparent that global dominance is the present long-term goal.
Unfortunately, hubris leads to blowback which can fly in the face of best laid plans.
Note: Video refuses to show up, although it was briefly displayed, in the preview so I've inserted a link to the video at The Real News.
Why is wikileaks important?
Because they understand that government is by its nature a conspiracy, i.e., an attempt to maintain one secret internal reality for decision-making and action while maintaining a different public reality. To put it simply, we now have a situation in which we the people are funding a secret government with a secret army. Having a military force that not only is secret but that also considers itself superior to the populace it supposedly serves--this is a very dangerous state of affairs. One need not insult individual members of the military nor prove any specific POTUS untrustworthy to see this as a systemic problem with enormous potential for abuse, even for abuse fatal to our system of government.
Obama could say "so what?" and get away with it
a solemn talk about the necessities of doing what he has to do in this modern world. He'd wish he didn't have to blah blah blah, and enough people would go along with him that it would become official, accepted policy.
Sometimes I think this will change only when the rest of the world says "enough".
That is true statement, which is sad
Sad, too, that I can't fully imagine people saying "enough". Such is the power of skillful propaganda with a thoroughly addictive delivery system. But I'm always negative, see how high the mountain is to climb. I do appreciate that you mention a solution.
"the rest of the world"--a key phrase in your formulation that I have been focusing on from the aspect of solidarity. The only possible thwarting of human behavior which has us on a suicidal path is solidarity. Somehow, through some miracle, the human race could wake up and commit themselves to cease exploitation of others and devote their efforts to the common good. Humans do not make decisions, then act rationally. Emotions play the crucial role. The human emotion which can cause us to subjugate our selfish interests for the common good--that emotion is compassion. So, long story short (that was a joke), I believe one thing I can contribute toward a general solution is to nourish compassion in myself and recommend it to others, or ask them to show me how. Compassion. Fortunately, this pov seems completely synchronous with what might be called my religious stirrings.
The other controllable behavior is meditation. Withdrawing one's senses from the outer world, strengthening one's connection with oneself. This is the antidote to many ills, starting with the other-directedness which lies at least near the root of postemotional behavior. This is the antidote to propaganda, building resistance to being manipulated by others in addition to the obvious, spending less time being exposed to propaganda. Again, with this second action, meditation, there is synchrony with what I had considered a personal practice, not something to affect the external world. How relieved I am to think that my personal practice serves as a politically effective practice as well. Or, more accurately, not politically hopeless.
If anyone's interested, this all comes from Mestrovic's Postemotional Society. Everything is in that book. The collective unconscious is broken. The collective unconscious is built through collective exuberance. Think being a fan at a football game. Think the marathon, emotional plays of ancient Greece. Think the burning man festival. Collective exuberance. Much collective exuberance today is controlled and abstract, mediated through television. The symbols which become the trigger for the re-living of collective exuberance apart from the immediate experience, these symbols are consciously manipulated. What if everything were an advertisement? The military is there. Scantily clad women are there, keeping us oversexed and stupid. Male virility. These are associated with Gillette razors. We need some male virility associated with compassion. We need some mutual enthusiasm connected with sacrificing for the community. We need loving images of women as effective householders and parents, by which I mean depicted as more than sex symbols.
That's collective exuberance. That's how we repair the collective unconscious. That is my mission. That is the only way to build solidarity. And solidarity is the only way to say "Enough!"