Last Western Prisoner Leaves Guantanamo
http://www.thestar.com/specialsections/omarkhadr/article/1264339--omar-k...
Omar Khadr was 15 when he was wounded in a battle in Afghanistan in 2002. Since that time, he has been held in U.S. custody, primarily, in Guantanamo Prison. Not only was Khadr himself wounded during the battle, but U.S. Army Delta Forces Sergeant Christopher Speer was killed. In 2010, Khadr pleaded guilty before a military tribunal to five war crimes, including murder in the violation of war for the death of Sergeant Speer. {NOTE:: In researching this article I discovered that there is a great deal of controversy surrounding the charges made by the U.S. against Khadr. Four of the five charges are not violations of the accepted‘international rules of war’; those charges are: murder in violation of the law of war, attempted murder in violation of the law of war, conspiracy, and material support for terrorism. Those crimes are more correctly classified as violations of U.S. domestic law. However, that discussion is outside the scope of this article. For those interested, additional reading can be found here: http://opiniojuris.org/2010/05/26/the-non-existent-murder-in-violation-o...
http://www.crimesofwar.org/a-z-guide/war-crimes-categories-of/
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2010/nov/02/omar-khad...}
Omar Khadr was born in Toronto, Canada in 1988. His father, Ahmed Khadr, is an enigmatic individual who was killed in Pakistan in 2003 in a shootout between al-Qaeda and Taliban forces and the Pakistani army. There is a great deal of dispute as to whether or not Ahmed Khadr was a humanitarian simply trying to help the impoverished peoples of Afghanistan and Pakistan, or if he was a terrorist. What is not in dispute is that Ahmed Khadr shuttled his family back and forth between Pakistan, Afghanistan and Canada. One can only imagine how these moves shaped the young Omar’s view of the world as he moved between those two wildly different worlds.
Omar was 15 years old in 2002 when he was captured on a battlefield in Afghanistan. By any country’s definition, that means he was a child soldier. However, the U.S. military did not classify Omar as a child soldier; instead, he was classified as an enemy combatant. Omar was held in prison without trial until October 2010. Whether he was subjected to torture is in dispute. He was allowed to be treated by a U.S. military psychiatrist, and he was allowed U.S. military counsel. Yet, for 10 years he was kept in prison, before he was finally tried before a U.S. military tribunal. Omar pleaded guilty and was given an 8 year sentence, which also included an agreement with the Canadian government that after serving one more year in Guantanamo prison, Omar would be transferred to a Canadian prison to complete his sentence. That transfer, more than a year over due, finally took place this month. Omar is now back in his native Canada. Based on Canadian law, he will be eligible for parole next year.
There is no dispute that Omar Khadr was 15 years old when he was captured on a battlefield in Afghanistan. There is no dispute that the U.S. government allowed him to be held for 8 years without trial. A child soldier is captured in the midst of war by the most powerful country on the planet. A child soldier is held for 8 years in prison without trial by a country that considers itself a nation of laws. Omar Khadr made a mistake when he was 15 years old, he was a young man who made a mistake that can only be understood when one considers his age. The United States made a mistake when it imprisoned a child solder and held him without trial for 8 years. That mistake can only be understood when one considers the fact that our hysteria is greater than our laws.
Comments
Guantanamo is a blight on American history
This prison needs to be closed. The men in there deserve trials. Give them their trials or give them their freedom, it really is just that simple.
gawd the whole Gitmo can of worms never
ceases to piss me off...
i cannot fathom how it is still open. i get it when the neocons were officially in charge, but good gawd damn - that stopped supposedly in Jan 2009. yet, here we are...
wtf?!? we are the bad guys now...
Heartbreaking story
First off, anyone who was in Guantanamo during that time period was tortured. He was, at the very least, in solitary confinement long enough to be considered torture, and he was most likely forced to hold stress positions. That is the minimal. Much more is almost definite.
They have no evidence for these prisoners. When serious JAG officers first started trying to create justice out of war crimes and thin air, they looked at the evidence. It was a total disaster, completely disorganized, no reliable chain of custody, names spelled wrong, using three different names to describe supposedly the same person, and on top of it all, very little actual evidence. To hold a fair trial is to set them all free. There is no evidence. There is much evidence, however, that these detainees were tortured. Some were tortured to death and did not live to see today.