File this under No one could have predicted:
Man Orders TV Through Amazon, Gets Assault Rifle
When D.C. resident Seth Horvitz ordered a flat-panel TV on Amazon, he didn’t expect to get a military-grade assault rifle in return.
Horvitz ordered the TV, a Westinghouse 39-inch LCD, for about $320 from a third-party electronics seller on Amazon.
snip
Not being one to want a personal “shock and awe” arsenal of his own, Horvitz contacted the D.C. police. They immediately confiscated the box, which contained a semi-automatic Sig Sauer 716 patrol rifle. The police informed Horvitz that the gun was illegal in the District of Columbia.
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
The Constitution's guarantee of due process means the president can't act as judge, jury and executioner of suspected terrorists, especially when they are U.S. citizens.
Whether or not it succeeds in court, a lawsuit challenging the killings of Al Qaeda figure Anwar Awlaki and two other U.S. citizens clearly lays out the problems with the Obama administration's policy of "targeted killings" of suspected terrorists even outside the battle zone of Afghanistan.
Allowing the president of the United States to act as judge, jury and executioner for suspected terrorists, including U.S. citizens, on the basis of secret evidence is impossible to reconcile with the Constitution's guarantee that a life will not be taken without due process of law. Under the law, the government must obtain a court order if it seeks to target a U.S. citizen for electronic surveillance, yet there is no comparable judicial review of a decision to kill a citizen. No court is even able to review the general policies for such assassinations. (Awlaki's family failed in 2010 to persuade a court to enjoin the government from killing him.)
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
Hooray for justice. Boo to the dissenters.
Detailed Parking Tickets Breach Personal Privacy, Appeals Court Says
A federal appeals court is reinstating a class-action privacy suit, ruling that police departments who put too much private data on parking citations are violating U.S. privacy law.
The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decided against the police department of Palatine Village, a Chicago suburb. When issuing electronically produced parking citations, the department lists the vehicle owner’s name, address, driver’s license number, date of birth, sex, height and weight. That ticket and accompanying information is usually left underneath a vehicle’s windshield-wiper blade.
The case dates to 2010, when a cited motorist sued Palatine Village, alleging the disclosure of his identity was a breach of the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act of 1994. Congress adopted the privacy legislation in response to the death of actress Rebecca Schaeffer. She was killed by a stalker who had obtained her unlisted home address through the California DMV.
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
el oh el -- Stephen Colbert is a comedic genius.
Wikipedia Locks Pages Of Potential Romney VP Picks, Thanks To Stephen Colbert
Wikipedia, in a move to thwart merry pranksters from wreaking havoc across the site, is blocking edits on encyclopedia entries about possible GOP vice-presidential nominees.
snip
Politics blog Tech President speculated on Monday that clues to Romney's running mate might be spotted in recently edited Wikipedia entries, prompting a flurry of media interest that inspired comedian Stephen Colbert to call on his viewers to make a few creative Wiki edits of their own.
"Go on Wikipedia and make as many edits as possible to your favorite VP contender," Colbert said during a segment on his Tuesday night show. He then pulled out a laptop and narrated a mock-editing of Tim Pawlenty's page.
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
If they gave out awards for dumb new policy ideas, President Obama and Republican rising star Sen. Marco Rubio would both be medaling this week. Their achievements? Rubio’s completely pointless bill offering a tax break to recipients of Olympic medals and—even worse—the president’s decision to hop on the bandwagon rather than show the country he has a firmer grasp on the issues than his adversaries do. In the scheme of things, of course, winning Olympic prizes is not an important sector of economic activity, and the medals’ tax status doesn’t really matter. But the overall shape of the tax code does matter a great deal, and the speed with which a bipartisan consensus emerged around making it worse bodes quite poorly for efforts to make it better.
snip
Then the president, who courageously rejected rivals’ gimmicky gas-tax holiday schemes on the campaign trail four years ago, decided to endorse Rubio’s bill rather than try to win some points for good sense.
With the president now on board, there’s a good chance Rubio’s idea will become law. In fiscal terms, the change will be minuscule. In terms of fairness, it seems like a strange slight to winners of other kinds of prizes. Are Olympic medalists worthier than winners of the Nobel or Pulitzer prizes? And of course exempting all prize income from income tax could merely encourage all kinds of people to restructure their income as prizes. The J.P. Morgan Memorial Prize for Achievement in Investment Banking, anyone?
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
The following story is linked here ONLY for the purposes of yet another demonstration that laws only apply to some people, and the "law enforcement officials" who enabled this to happen, in my opinion, should all be fired on the spot. As we've seen over and over again, "law enforcement" is an oxymoron.
Mitt Romney's Motorcade Chased by Orthodox Jews in Sunny Lakewood, NJ
Pool reporter Holly Bailey of Yahoo News, filed this:
Romney arrived at Lake Terrace, the site of his fundraiser tonight, at roughly 3:35 pm, after what your pooler can only describe as a harrowing high-speed motorcade from Newark airport to Lakewood NJ. Hitting speeds of up to 90 mph at times, the motorcade made what had been scheduled as a 61-minute drive in roughly 45 minutes on a route that took us along the Jersey Turnpike to the Garden State Parkway and prompted your pooler to wonder many times if she would live to cover Romney's remarks at the fundraiser tonight. The motorcade was escorted by unmarked police SUVs which at times flashed their lights. At one point, we passed a school bus where several little kids could been seen standing on their seats to get a glimpse of the motorcade.
And I adopt this comment as posted under the story:
I thought the public...
...has shown in the Corzine and the Death Race stories that it doesn't appreciate the police endangering everyone on the Turnpike with reckless driving. I thought the state police had said these things were wrong. Speeding past school buses at up to 90 mph?
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
The four-paragraph "Student Pregnancy Policy" in Delhi Charter School's policy manual says that if a suspected girl refuses to take a pregnancy test, she can be removed from class or the school.
That violates the U.S. Constitution and federal laws against sexual discrimination, state ACLU executive director Marjorie R. Esman said.
snip
Former school principal Steve Gaharan told the newspaper he was always concerned when he had to enforce the policy, which came up about once a year. Gaharan said he was forced to resign earlier this year over an alleged violation that wasn't explained to him.
"The system used at Delhi Charter School is quite unusual and punishing to the young lady; however the young man can strut along, continue in school and compete in or participate in all extracurricular activities," he said. "However, the pregnant young lady is not only excluded from all of these activities, but also must be home-schooled instead of having the privilege of attending school."
In other words, NO, you can't have birth control, NO, you can't have an abortion, and NO, you can't get a proper education if you're pregnant. GO INCUBATE.
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
By Mark Miller
Aug 7 (Reuters) - Are you going to retire in poverty?
Today's seniors are more affluent than the general population. But the generations that follow them - starting with the baby boom generation - will not be as fortunate. The decline of pensions, the erosion of Social Security and the housing crash all are pointing toward a new crisis of poverty among lower- and middle-class seniors in the years ahead.
Social Security and pensions, in particular, have been the two most important factors in keeping seniors out of poverty for decades. Both provide reliable, guaranteed income sources for life. And home equity has been an important fall-back source of assets that can be tapped in retirement. That is because seniors typically have more equity built up in their homes than younger homeowners and carry less debt into retirement.
Indeed, the poverty rate for seniors in 2010 (the most recent year available) was just 9 percent, compared with 15 percent for the general U.S. population.
But the economic safety net is fraying quickly.
Comments
Happy Birthday to Dustin Hoffman.
75 is the new 65. Please?
Happy 75th birthday, Dustin Hoffman!
plastics
heh~
Plastics, hee hee. I was going to link that video
but decided to go for the more "sexy" video ;)
I want to start doing a trivia
quiz post, possibly on Saturday nights. I think it will be fun.
I think that's a great idea.
I'm looking forward to it.
I'm an expert at trivia in a very narrow field.
Translated: I'm not very good at it ;)
But it will be fun to try. I usually do better when I play on a team.
Trivia contest seems like fun
I remember several things that happened before 1975. Don't ask anything from today, though.
I saw the film with my mother and sister. When we left, she was quiet for a while--I could tell she wasn't into it. Then she said more quietly than usual in her affected genteel southern drawl, "Well, y'all are just lucky to have the parents y'all have." Translation: MY MOTHER WAS NO MRS. ROBINSON!
el oh el, geomoo.
That was funny.
I can go all the way back
to the silents, geomoo, but i don't think that would be much fun for most peoples~
I have never been one to be silent, so you're right ;)
~
I need to link this petition here...
http://www.change.org/petitions/president-obama-restore-justice-please-p...
I have been following this since, well...the beginning. I don't have much faith that Obama will grant a pardon to Gov Seigelman, but I still think we need to raise holy hell and make as loud a noise as possible.
Not much hope, as I shared with OPOL
It could be argued that activists would most productively focus their interest on the justice system. Siegelman, a high profile and very popular figure is subjected to kangaroo justice right out in the open, and they get away with it. Obama as judge and jury. There are so many examples today of politicizing of the justice department. Yet one more thing that we thought we were electing Obama to fix, and he ends up doubling down on Bush's destruction of a proud U.S. institution.
And people balk at the suggestion that Bush and Obama
aren't cut from the same cloth. News flash: They are.
Granted, there is nuance attached to it, but not enough to make a difference for the good -- just that Obama's rhetoric is better but not his deeds.
Thank you for linking it.
What happened to Gov Siegelman was a tragedy. And Democrats, effing Democratic leadership let it happen -- no, I'm wrong. Democratic leadership made it happen. DISGUSTING.
Yaybama.
Good evening
Thanks for the roundup. A bit of a surprise to see the former principal of that school speak sensibly and with an awareness of sexism. Perhaps there's more hope than I often imagine. That policy is so reminiscent of the horrible suffering girls and young women experienced in the 50's when they were usually disappeared for the duration of the pregnancy, the whole affair kept secret.
However the operative word is "former."
But I take your point and agree.
Moving on, I've been hopeful to see quite a few sensible rulings by judges recently. Outside of the Supreme Court, judges' rulings are starting to trend for the good.
And while we're signing petitions, I'd like to add this one:
Stop Online Ammo
I need to post Bill Hicks...
because we need to make this choice every day~
“The world is like a ride in an amusement park, and when you choose to go on it you think it's real because that's how powerful our minds are. The ride goes up and down, around and around, it has thrills and chills, and it's very brightly colored, and it's very loud, and it's fun for a while. Many people have been on the ride a long time, and they begin to wonder, "Hey, is this real, or is this just a ride?" And other people have remembered, and they come back to us and say, "Hey, don't worry; don't be afraid, ever, because this is just a ride." And we … kill those people. "Shut him up! I've got a lot invested in this ride, shut him up! Look at my furrows of worry, look at my big bank account, and my family. This has to be real." It's just a ride. But we always kill the good guys who try and tell us that, you ever notice that? And let the demons run amok … But it doesn't matter, because it's just a ride. And we can change it any time we want. It's only a choice. No effort, no work, no job, no savings of money. Just a simple choice, right now, between fear and love. The eyes of fear want you to put bigger locks on your doors, buy guns, close yourself off. The eyes of love instead see all of us as one. Here's what we can do to change the world, right now, to a better ride. Take all that money we spend on weapons and defenses each year and instead spend it feeding and clothing and educating the poor of the world, which it would pay for many times over, not one human being excluded, and we could explore space, together, both inner and outer, forever, in peace.”
~ Bill Hicks
Absolutely.
`
Special tax breaks for Olympians?
Our government is a fucking joke.
I want a tax break, in fact I don't want to pay
any taxes when I win the lottery. Hell, I paid for the ticket with money that I paid taxes on. Enough is enough ;)
If I'm not mistaken, the dancing horses already
get a tax break. So that's taken care of.
And YES, when I win the lottery, I shall share with
everyone who posts in this Open for Discussion thread.
You can hold me to it ;)
you know I will.
I will hunt you down~
Well, if you don't give me your full name, address,
phone number, birth date, Social Security number, then I'm sorry, you can't partake.
triv33 posted this here before, but it deserves to posted
again for those who didn't see it.
Thanks for posting that again
I forgot to go back and play it. Wow, that was great. That's not the original Obama girl, is it? She mentions when she used to sing. Wow.
I can't wait to go post that on other reality-based blogs around the blogosphere.
I love that "reality-based" reference, but I hope you don't
get all "pragmatic" on us ;)
You mean, . . .
it may not be as much fun as I'm thinking?
Yes, yes, that's exactly what I mean. ;)
~