Occupy China/Open Thread

Well it looks like the kids aren't alright.

'Occupy' with Chinese characteristics

One of life's many ironies is that the Occupy model of disobedient activism has racked up more successes in the land ruled by that poster child of remorseless authoritarianism, the Chinese Communist Party, than it has in the United States.

More anarchy below.

US Occupy activists were quickly and efficiently shoveled into the "dirty dreamy disorderly hippie radical" box by political, economic, and media elites eager to make the world safe for income inequality. For their part, the activists - very much like the 1989 protesters in China - were all too eager to occupy the morally (and, up to a point, physically) safer high ground of non-violent civil disobedience.

Passive petitioning resulted in little more than littered, smelly encampments in public parks and a fatal loss of interest and support from the US public.

Things are different in China.

,

They "kids" (and I say that as an oldie but a goodie) have a message.

About 5,000 people filled the streets in central Qidong before 6 a.m., when the rally began. The protesters began chanting, "Protect the environment" against the dangers posed by a plan for a drainage pipeline into local waters.

But less than 10 minutes later, the crowd broke through a row of police officers blocking the main street and started marching toward the city government building 1 kilometer away. The demonstrators became louder after they reached the building.

Several minutes later, they pulled down the steel gate and swarmed over the premises.

About 2,000 occupied the inner courtyard, several thousand on the street in front of the city government building and many others in nearby structures overlooking the building, bringing the total of protesters to more than 10,000.

Topic: 

Tags: 

Rating: 

0
No votes yet

Comments

A TomDispatch flashback

LaEscapee's picture

Chalmers Johnson, The CIA and a Blowback World

Steve Coll ends his important book on Afghanistan by quoting Afghan President Hamid Karzai: "What an unlucky country." Americans might find this a convenient way to ignore what their government did in Afghanistan between 1979 and the present, but luck had nothing to do with it. Brutal, incompetent, secret operations of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, frequently manipulated by the military intelligence agencies of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, caused the catastrophic devastation of this poor country. On the evidence contained in Coll's book Ghost Wars, neither the Americans nor their victims in numerous Muslim and Third World countries will ever know peace until the Central Intelligence Agency has been abolished.

It should by now be generally accepted that the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan on Christmas Eve 1979 was deliberately provoked by the United States. In his memoir published in 1996, the former CIA director Robert Gates made it clear that the American intelligence services began to aid the mujahidin guerrillas not after the Soviet invasion, but six months before it. In an interview two years later with Le Nouvel Observateur, President Carter's national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski proudly confirmed Gates' assertion. "According to the official version of history," Brzezinski said, "CIA aid to the mujahidin began during 1980, that's to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan. But the reality, kept secret until now, is completely different: on 3 July 1979 President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And on the same day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained that in my opinion this aid would lead to a Soviet military intervention."

Oh yeah like all others this Chalmers Johnson piece is a must read,

0
No votes yet

Chalmers Johnson was an eye opener

sartoris's picture

Even for a hardcore cynic like myself some of the stuff I read in The Sorrows Of Empire and Blowback really surprised me. I had no idea how deeply connected we were to the Suharto regime and I had absolutely never studied the atrocities that took place in East Timor. I have not read Nemesis but it's on my list. I think it was Kipling that said: Afghanistan is where empires go to die.

0
No votes yet

aw, now you did it...........

sartoris's picture

I've been listening to McMurtry since Painting by Numbers. Like Steve Earle he is just someone who should be required listening. However, We Can't Make It Here is one of those songs I usually skip. It's just so damn true and so damn depressing. Now I'm going to have to go watch some funny kitten videos or I'll be too depressed to even get to work tomorrow.

0
No votes yet