Open Thread - Sans Binders and Big Bird Edition

Sanders: Don’t Use Social Security COLA to Cut Benefits

October 16, 2012

BURLINGTON, Vt., Oct. 16 - U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said today's announcement of only a 1.7 percent cost-of-living increase for 56 million Social Security recipients underscores the need to shield seniors and disabled veterans from proposals to cut benefits.

"The method for calculating inflation for seniors is broken. Instead of fixing the problem, some in Washington and on Wall Street want to make a bad situation even worse by cutting benefits for senior citizens and veterans through a so-called chained CPI. It would be a shock to millions of seniors and disabled veterans to learn that some in Washington think their current COLAs are too generous," said Sanders, who founded the Defending Social Security Caucus in the Senate.

The cost-of-living adjustment, or COLA, for 2013 is one of the lowest increases since the automatic annual adjustments were adopted in 1975. (There was no increase in benefits in 2010 or 2011.)

It could get worse. Today's senior citizens and disabled veterans would see their benefits go down under a plan pushed by former Sen. Alan Simpson (R-Wyo.) and Erskine Bowles, the investment banker and former White House chief of staff. Among other draconian cuts, the Simpson-Bowles plan would change the formula for calculating inflation by shifting to a chained CPI or consumer price index.

"Let's be clear: for millions of senior citizens and disabled veterans living on fixed incomes, the chained CPI is not the minor ‘tweak' that some say it is. It is a significant benefit cut that will make it harder for the elderly and veterans to make ends meet."

Under the chained CPI, the average senior who retires at age 65 would see their Social Security benefits cut by about $560 a year when they reach 75 and by about $1,000 a year once they turn 85. At the beginning of 2012, the average Social Security benefit for a retired worker was $14,760 per year.

The chained CPI would also substantially cut the VA benefits of more than 3 million veterans. The largest cuts would impact young, permanently disabled veterans who were seriously wounded in combat. According to the Social Security Administration, the chained CPI would mean that permanently disabled veterans who started receiving VA disability benefits at age 30 would see their benefits cut by more than $1,300 a year at age 45; $1,800 a year at age 55; and $2,260 a year at age 65.

"The idea of balancing the budget on the backs of some of the most vulnerable people in our country - the elderly, orphans, widows and disabled veterans - is not only morally grotesque, it is extremely bad economics," Sanders said.

The senator is backing another proposal to change the way inflation is calculated for seniors. It would likely raise benefits by taking into account the greater costs for health care and prescription drugs as well as home heating and cooling, which generally outstrip inflation for other goods and services used by the population at large.

And the specifics that Obama provided last night, Yippee !

"OBAMA: ...the choice in this election is going to be whose promises are going to be more likely to help you in your life? Make sure your kids can go to college. Make sure that you are getting a good paying job, making sure that Medicare and Social Security... (CROSSTALK)

CROWLEY: Mr. President. Thank you.

(CROSSTALK)

OBAMA: ...will be there for you.

Making sure it will be there for us? Anybody can do that: Change the payouts to $5.00 a month and it will last forever.

***********************************************

The House I Live In

Brad Pitt: US war on drugs is a 'charade' In promotion of new documentary The House I Live in, Pitt says America's anti-drugs strategy is 'backward'

Pitt, who takes a producer's credit on the new film from Why We Fight director Eugene Jarecki, flew in from Europe especially to appear at the Sundance Sunset Cinema in west Hollywood. Jarecki's documentary suggests that efforts by the US government to fight drug trafficking are doomed to failure, and that a new approach should be adopted.

"My drug days have long since passed," Pitt told the Hollywood Reporter. "But I could probably land in any American city and within 24 hours find whatever you want. But we still support this charade called the drug war. We spent a trillion dollars over 40 years and a lot of people have lost their lives over it."

***********************************************

I'm sorry I can't stick around to comment in this post because I'm distracted by this shiny object that I must, I mean MUST have:

$41,500 Fridge Is the Size of a Small Car

Topic: 

Rating: 

0
No votes yet

Comments

Me neither.

Glinda's picture

But I think it would fit perfectly into the homes of multimillionaires and billionaires.

The thing is, though, when an everyday necessity such as a refrigerator and then it's that elaborate and that price, really, do they need add-ons to boost the price? I find that so odd.

The thing is a monstrosity meant for 2,000 square foot plus kitchens, and there are options? Really?

0
No votes yet

"Not in a good frame of mind"

geomoo's picture

That would be Demi, who is not in a good frame of mind. Just heard so on Inside Edition. Also heard the question posed, straight-faced in best fake innocent by-stander fashion, "Is all this attention good for a little girl like Honey Boo Boo?" This was after extended footage of the little girl in question, who is in Beverley Hills. I know these things because of the tv my wife watches. It's more funny than one might expect, but far too sickening to bear long, for me.

We'll finish the outside tomorrow, except for painting--ready for winter when we get the roof on. But the roofer NEEDS TO CALL ME BACK! Like NOW!

I really enjoy these, Glinda. Very fine.

0
No votes yet

Keeping Social Security alive means keeping millions alive

sartoris's picture

Thanks for another excellent roundup from the hardest working blogger online. Your dedication to this site is remarkable.

The truth is that saving the Social Security program would be neither complicated nor expensive for the vast majority of the population. Eliminate the cap on payroll taxes AND subject ALL forms of income to the FICA tax. Additionally, cap the amount of monthly benefits that a person could receive based on their Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) for the previous 2 years of income tax filings. By that I mean if a Social Security recipient had AGI in excess of 100k for 2 years in a row then the amount of their monthly benefits would be capped at a specific amount. If that is not done then the growth in their benefits would need to be recalculated to keep their monthly benefits from reaching astronomical amounts. All income must be subject to the FICA tax. That alone would 'save' the program. It would even be possible to 'exempt' the first 5000 (or whatever number) of capital gains to keep things simple and not harm the little investors.

0
No votes yet