Welcome to You're Doing It Wrong, a weekly column taking the Powers That Be (PTB), especially the media and talking heads, to task for poor information and poor framing.
This week I’m building on the narrative from last week on the state of journalism in this country. I’m doing it because last Sunday I finally had the time to watch all the episodes that I had DVRd of the new show The Newsroom, and I’m giddy about it.
It’s a show that is about a fictional newsroom at a cable network. Granted it’s a drama, so its characters are going to have their share of personal story lines, but when it comes to showcasing the news and a newsroom, what goes on and more importantly what should be going on – this show gets as close to right as I’ve seen anything get.
The main protagonists are a big time but unhappy anchor who gets a new Executive Producer who convinces him that news can be successful when done truthfully. So they decide to do the actual news the way it should be done, damn the PTB and the ad execs and the network CEO and other various newsroom associate producers and employees.
They set out to do news as it’s supposed to be done: screw ruffling the PTBs feathers, whether that PTB is in political office or corporate representative. Screw the whole ‘there are 2 legitimate sides to every story’ bullshit, cuz there are many cases where the opposition has as much legitimacy in their arguments as the flat-earthers did once upon a time. Screw covering the fluff simply because it is “good television”. Screw showing deference to someone simply because of that person’s status. Ask the hard questions, call them on lies and inconsistencies, press for answers. And it’s a beautiful thing that unfolds once they decide to do the actual news.
I had a debate last week with some friends of mine about The Newsroom. A few of them were disappointed at what they perceived as deference to the president, but that’s not how I viewed the program. My argument was this:
The problem with us in this country is we've become downright accustomed to our news having a political lean one way or the other, and the corporate owned news orgs have been more than happy to keep perpetuating it, and they get more brazen with every year that passes. We’ve lost, and many of us have never known or barely remember the days when the news was news and oped was oped and there was a definitive bright line between it. Throw in the tabloidesqueness of it today, and the manufactured controversy, and that's a great deal of why we've become some of the lowest info people on the planet.
The news is not supposed to care who you are or what your party is. The news is not supposed to cover certain people favorably and other unfavorably; we’re just used to that in this country cuz that’s how it’s been done for the past couple decades. The news is not supposed to give the PTB deferential treatment. The news is not supposed to gin up attacks. The news is not supposed to manufacture controversy. Any editorialization in a newscast is supposed to be clearly marked so the viewer can discern between news and oped. The news is supposed to give you the facts and the context and let the viewer form his own opinions. The news is supposed to give we the people the information we need to make informed decisions when we participate in our democracy (or a democracy considering I don’t really consider us a democracy anymore).
Now, as I said before, it is a drama, and it is done by Aaron Sorkin, so there will be some more idealistic portrayals and it will get preachy at times, as it did in The West Wing, but overall, I expect it to show what could be in this country if the journalists and news honchos did what they were supposed to be doing all these years.
Combined with Glenn Greenwald’s brilliant column last week about journalists being inept stenographers, this should be a wake up call to those who wish to follow in the footsteps of the greats: Brinkley, Murrow, Cronkite, et al… The Newsroom’s message is one that desperately needs to be heeded by the folks who bring us our news programming.
So to most of the journalists today: You’re Doing It Wrong! Want to know how to do it right? Watch The Newsroom. It’s certainly made my must see TV viewing list.
Now available in Orange...
Comments
It's really a great show. The Intro:
I guess I'll have to wait for it to come out on Netflix.
News? It's hard to get the real deal anymore. And a whole generation of kids - or more - has been raised without seeing a Walter Cronkite on at 5 or 6 every night.
it'll be worth the watch when it does...
yeah, the opinionated pap we get handed every night nowadays doesn't even deserve to be called news in many many cases...
we've been dumbed down. but that's what the PTB want. a dumbed down public is less likely to notice the stink of some of the things that they are doing that are grossly under-reported if reported at all... sigh...
was just told that HBO put the entire first ep...
up on youtube if you have some time to kill at some point... :D
the trouble is...
the people who own the media. they don't want us to have any actual news. if we can't break that up, this will not change.
yeah, but part of the fault does fall on the journalists...
especially the ones with the bigger names. but i think a lot of them enjoy the celebrity that comes in today's media. and i don't think a lot of them were trained properly, and they may not remember the days when the news was news and oped was oped...
there's a lot of blame to go around... even some on us viewers...
No. Me-personally? I'm not having any.
I took it upon myself long ago to start communicating with those big spurting heads on the teevee and their masters and I regularly grant them the full measure of my displeasure.
Let's face it, the Telecommunications Act of '96 has a full entry in the wikipedia, but all it really needs is the last line...
"Never have so many been held incommunicado by so few."
Eduardo Galeano~
that's us. and it pisses me off mightily.
i was meaning in a general sense... it certainly...
does not fall on me either, as i am a lot like you in that matter. i've been harping and bitching at them for a long time and sermonizing to others, lol...
fallen on deaf ears, but not for lack of trying.... :D
I'm sorry, but the program bugs me
in the same way that TDS and Colbert bug me. They are enjoyable, but they are toothless entertainment for the already disempowered, creating the illusion that there is a meaningful debate in this country about these matters. You can speak truth so long as you're only joking or it's only fiction. (I keep thinking of Colbert's joke at the press club about the fearless journalists standing up to TPTB, "You know, fiction.") I think that is a dangerous situation in which actual agitation for change is short-circuited by fantasy. I do enjoy the show, and I agree with your assessment, but I can't help that it bugs me because there is no chance this program will have any effect on the infotainment programs continuing on their present course. In the unlikely event that the show started having impact, it would be gone in a New York minute, shut down either by the media giant that owns the program or by the media giants that distribute it. Sorry, but that's my gloomy take on this--that progressives are dangerously confused about the difference between information and thoughtful speculation as opposed to actual power.
fair enough, but i think this part wouldn't necessarily be...
the fault of the show:
it's more the fault of the news culture that exists nowadays... and i have no doubt they'll ignore it. but at the very least, it will give viewers a peek at what they're missing. if it gets through to some of them, that's a victory imo. and if it does start showing any impact, we'll see if HBO has courage. they may be a little different in that they are subscriber based and don't have a news division... i dare to dream... :D
but the overall message of the program is that what we've been being given is not news; here's what news looks like.
it's very sad that the most accurate commentary has to be delivered to us in the form of a TV show meant for entertainment purposes, but i suppose that since that's the only kind of thing that most folks in the country pay attention to anymore, it's better than nothing at all.... :D
It should bug you.
I believe it's worse than toothless entertainment, I'm more cynical. I think it's there to serve a purpose. It's a little pressure release valve of a show, there to give us the illusion that the agitation could still be effective. Much like TDS/Colbert. What if we held a rally and everybody said--meh? Yeah, I find it distressing.
see, that's the difference for me...
i tend to be an optimist by nature - sometimes a tad too optimistic, though i've definitely got a growing cynical side now.
and the optimist in me thinks if this serves to inspire just a handful of student journalists, or anyone for that matter, to action, then it's worth it. and imo, people aren't going to agitate less because of it, so for me, i see it as a no harm no foul with a possible though not probable upside...
i am acutely aware though that my optimistic nature irks the hell out of some people... ;>
If I had HBO
I'd dust off my tv and give it a look and at least pretend I was watching the real thing.
yeah i hear ya! and the interesting thing about that is...
they are using real news stories - their timeline started in April 2010 with the Deepwater Horizon disaster, so it's easy to pretend you're watching the real thing... :D
oy
I've watched about ten minutes now. It IS a fine show from the bit I've seen but having real news as the fictional storyline on a tv show is upsetting. I have no idea what that would do to someone ( all of those 20 somethings) never exposed to true honest hard hitting news casts. I don't want them to think it is a fictional thing. I want them to know that it is a LOST thing that must be returned to its rightful and most necessary place in society.
i'm hoping that the first ep sets it up...
well enough... the discussion of what the news has been is there, and that they are going to do it as it should be done is there as well... hoping... i think the average viewer of a Sorkin series is probably a little more informed than say you regular TV viewers... or i hope... :D
I like the show, though I recognize some superficial aspects
The media issue is portrayed correctly, even if some aspects of Will's character is a tad bit "Looking for Nelson Rockefeller" for me when that age is dead. When he and (Jane Fonda) Leona Lansing come to blows we will see how realistic it is. Emily Mortimer's character is my favorite via MacKenzie McHale.
The relationships bug me a little, except for Will and MacKenzie's love hate relationship; I love that shit. But as far as the critiques it's not supposed to be Democracy Now which should reach a wider audience, but more the dynamics as to why DN can't reach a wider audience involving economics of scale and barrier entrances; all the corporate BS one would have to put up with. So far so good, but the shows still has a lot to prove. Though I like it, I thought the Rudy episode sucked, but I do get enjoyment out of it.
yeah, any show is gonna have it's drawbacks...
but it is pretty good... and of course, the relationship stuff i like, cuz i need a little drama along with my drama...
and yeah, we'll see if it can keep it up. i'm hoping it will... :D