FCC Moves To End Net Neutrality

In a vote this afternoon the Federal Communications Commission voted
open debate on a proposal that would essentially end net neutrality. In a
3 - 2 vote, Chairman Thomas Wheeler and the two other Democratic
members voted to allow Internet service providers charge content companies for faster and more reliable delivery of their traffic to users.

Critics worry the rules would create "fast lanes" for
companies that pay up and slower traffic for others, although Wheeler
has pledged to prevent "acts to divide the Internet between 'haves' and
'have nots.'"

The FCC's proposal tentatively concludes that some pay-for-priority
deals may be allowed, but asks whether "some or all" such deals should
be banned and how to ensure paid prioritization does not relegate any
traffic to "slow lanes." [..]

Consumer advocates want the FCC to reclassify Internet providers
as utilities, like telephone companies, rather than as the
less-regulated information services they are now.

Opponents have told Wheeler that stricter regulations would throw
the industry into legal limbo, discourage investment in network
infrastructure and still not prevent pay-for-priority deals.

Numerous technology companies, including Google Inc and Facebook
Inc, have spoken out against allowing pay-for-priority, although they
have not called for reclassification.

At the moment, nothing has change but as Mike Masnick at Techdirt put
it, the door is now open to a very messy process that didn't need to
happen because the FCC has the power to declare the Internet a public
utility:

At this point, what we basically have is open
season on lobbyists trying to influence the FCC one way or another,
eventually leading to some sort of rulemaking, followed (inevitably) by a
bunch of lawsuits from broadband providers who aren't going to be happy
with any solution. And, of course, the potential (unlikely as it may
be) for Congress to get involved. [..]

And while Wheeler has suggested that the FCC is willing to knock down laws that block competition,
we'll believe it when we see it in action. On top of that, Wheeler made
it clear today that he still sees the interconnection issue as a
separate issue, even thought it's becoming clear that that's where the real problem is.
Oh, and while lots of people are calling for Title II reclassification,
and there are many reasons to believe that may be the best solution,
it's also exceptionally messy as well, because Title II has lots of
problems as well. The FCC would need to deal with those problems, via forbearance, which creates a whole different set of headaches. [..]

But, that doesn't mean that everyone should just throw up their
hands and go home to their (increasingly slow) internet. The broadband
lobbyists will not be doing that. And, of course, they know quite well
how to play the lobbying game and how to work the ins-and-outs of
everything above. It is why it's going to become increasingly important
to become much more informed on a variety of these issues and the true
implications of the choices the FCC makes in the coming months. If you
would like to weigh in, and I do suggest everyone seek to share their
comments with the FCC, I would suggest first spending a little time more
deeply reading through the full set of issues and what the pros and
cons of different options may be. You can file comments directly with the FCC or via a very, very handy Dear FCC tool that the EFF put together.

Time to take action by sending this easy letter to the FCC that the Electronic Freedom Foundation has put together:

 

 

 photo neutrality-3_zps2fd0f4dd.png   

It's our Internet. We made it, and it has re-made us, changing the way we communicate, learn, share and create.

We want the Internet to continue to live up to its promise,
fostering innovation, creativity and freedom. We don't want regulations
that will turn our ISPs into gatekeepers, making special deals with the
few companies that can "pay to play" and inhibiting new competition,
innovation and expression.

 

 

  

Start your letter to the FCC by clicking here

Keep the Internet Neutral

Topic: 

Tags: 

Rating: 

3
Your rating: None Average: 3 (3 votes)

Comments

What clearer indication is required that ...

BruceMcF's picture

... the Democratic party has a strong Corporate wing, which all too often dominates critical behind the scenes appointments like the FCC, FEC, SEC, Federal Reserve Board of Governors, and US Trade Representatives.

3
Your rating: None Average: 3 (2 votes)

Even more evidence

TMC's picture

that in some cases the Democrats are worse than the Republicans

3
Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

Of course "but" ...

BruceMcF's picture

... "but the President is the only one proposing halfway sane Transportation policies!" ... that's because Big Oil is in the Republican wing of the corporate party ... if Big Oil was still in the Democratic wing and the media companies were in the Republican wing, then the Republican transportation policies would be saner and Democratic appointments to the FCC would be more likely to refuse to support frontal assaults on net neutrality.

Though both within the broader bounds of a corporatist neoliberal view of the world ... the halfway sane Transportation policy still would not go far enough, and whichever appointees were not supporting a frontal assault on net neutrality would be supporting eating away at it by small bites at a time.

0
No votes yet